1 research outputs found
Joined-Up ICT Innovation in Government: An analysis of the creation of eIDM systems from an Advocacy Coalition and social capital perspective
This chapter introduces the subject of this thesis – joined-up ICT innovation in the
public sector. The first section demonstrates that scientists and policy makers fully
agree that ICT innovation should be a joint effort involving multiple public sector
actors. To solve today’s urgent social problems, specific government agencies
have to jointly rethink and improve practices – including their ICTs. However, as
section two demonstrates, there are some severe barriers to joined-up ICT innovation.
Evaluation studies consistently show that government agencies often fail to
realize cooperative change. The third section provides a review of literature that
attempts to explain the difficulties. The conclusion is that current public administration
theories merely provide a fragmented picture of determining variables.
The Advocacy Coalition Framework is introduced as it aims to overcome this theoretical
fragmentation. The framework offers a broad overview of all kinds of factors
that determine policy change. A confrontation between the variables of the
model and innovation literature reveals strong similarities, which indicate that the
model can also be applied to ‘innovation’. The fourth section identifies a critique of
the social subsystem of the model. Social capital theory is introduced in order to
address this critique as it can contribute to the operationalisation of the Advocacy
Coalition Framework and hence strengthen its explanatory value. In section five,
the unit of analysis is confined to a specific joined-up ICT innovation, namely the
joint development of electronic identification systems. Section six defines the
central research question, which combines the key elements: (a) the difficulties
of joined-up ICT innovations, (b) the use of the Advocacy Coalition Framework to
explain those difficulties and (c) social capital theory to enhance the framework.
The chapter concludes with the theoretical and social relevance of the study